
Rootella should not be adopted because a brochure sounds persuasive. It should be adopted where a farmer can see a clear purpose, compare an untreated area, and decide from the whole farming picture whether it belongs.
That has meant contacting growers, advisers, farmer networks and people who understand the practical constraints of a working farm. We have shared the Italy work, explained what Rootella is intended to support in the root zone, and looked for an honest first setting in which learning matters as much as marketing.
A useful trial needs an agreed comparison, simple records, and a shared commitment to report limits as well as promise. It may include observations of establishment, rooting, crop condition and, where possible, independently interpretable sampling. We want the farmer’s experience to be part of the evidence, not an afterthought.
We are still inviting United Kingdom growers, agricultural advisers and research partners who would like to explore a measured Rootella trial. The aim is modest and durable: find out where it helps, where it does not, and what a better soil partnership can look like in practice.
Draft note: this entry records outreach and trial design work; it makes no claim that a United Kingdom trial has yet been completed.
The Green Campus Journal chronicles the latest entries from all green teams.
For the full list of entries see: create.green/journal







For more articles see the full journal page